Shiraz E-Medical Journal

Published by: Kowsar

Readiness of Patients with Chronic Diseases to Use Health Information Technology: An Experience of a Developing Country

Mahnaz Samadbeik 1 , Ali Garavand 2 , Marzieh Saremian 3 , * , Zahra Baraei 4 and Mahin Adeli 5
Authors Information
1 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
2 School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Asadabad School of Medical Sciences, Asadabad, Iran
4 Student Research Committee, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
5 Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Health and Nutrition, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
Article information
  • Shiraz E-Medical Journal: October 2018, 19 (10); e65797
  • Published Online: September 4, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: January 1, 2018
  • Revised: July 1, 2018
  • Accepted: August 8, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/semj.65797

To Cite: Samadbeik M, Garavand A, Saremian M, Baraei Z , Adeli M. Readiness of Patients with Chronic Diseases to Use Health Information Technology: An Experience of a Developing Country, Shiraz E-Med J. 2018 ; 19(10):e65797. doi: 10.5812/semj.65797.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Allen M, Iezzoni LI, Huang A, Huang L, Leveille SG. Improving patient-clinician communication about chronic conditions: description of an internet-based nurse E-coach intervention. Nurs Res. 2008;57(2):107-12. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000313478.47379.98. [PubMed: 18347482].
  • 2. Cumbie SA, Conley VM, Burman ME. Advanced practice nursing model for comprehensive care with chronic illness: model for promoting process engagement. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2004;27(1):70-80. [PubMed: 15027663].
  • 3. El-Gayar O, Timsina P, Nawar N, Eid W. A systematic review of IT for diabetes self-management: are we there yet? Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(8):637-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.05.006. [PubMed: 23792137].
  • 4. Kruse RL, Koopman RJ, Wakefield BJ, Wakefield DS, Keplinger LE, Canfield SM, et al. Internet use by primary care patients: where is the digital divide? Fam Med. 2012;44(5):342-7. [PubMed: 23027117].
  • 5. Bauer UE, Briss PA, Goodman RA, Bowman BA. Prevention of chronic disease in the 21st century: elimination of the leading preventable causes of premature death and disability in the USA. Lancet. 2014;384(9937):45-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60648-6. [PubMed: 24996589].
  • 6. Rao S, Brammer C, McKethan A, Buntin MB. Health information technology: transforming chronic disease management and care transitions. Prim Care. 2012;39(2):327-44. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2012.03.006. [PubMed: 22608869].
  • 7. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20(6):64-78. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64. [PubMed: 11816692].
  • 8. Demiris G, Afrin LB, Speedie S, Courtney KL, Sondhi M, Vimarlund V, et al. Patient-centered applications: use of information technology to promote disease management and wellness. A white paper by the AMIA knowledge in motion working group. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(1):8-13. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2492. [PubMed: 17947617]. [PubMed Central: PMC2274880].
  • 9. Garcia-Lizana F, Sarria-Santamera A. New technologies for chronic disease management and control: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(2):62-8. doi: 10.1258/135763307780096140. [PubMed: 17359568].
  • 10. Koopman RJ, Petroski GF, Canfield SM, Stuppy JA, Mehr DR. Development of the PRE-HIT instrument: patient readiness to engage in health information technology. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-18. [PubMed: 24472182]. [PubMed Central: PMC3916695].
  • 11. Gruman JC. Making health information technology sing for people with chronic conditions. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(5 Suppl 2):S238-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.003. [PubMed: 21521600].
  • 12. Wildevuur SE, Simonse LW. Information and communication technology-enabled person-centered care for the "big five" chronic conditions: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(3). e77. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3687. [PubMed: 25831199]. [PubMed Central: PMC4393506].
  • 13. Colorafi K. Connected health: a review of the literature. Mhealth. 2016;2:13. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2016.03.09. [PubMed: 28293591]. [PubMed Central: PMC5344146].
  • 14. Kruse CS, Argueta DA, Lopez L, Nair A. Patient and provider attitudes toward the use of patient portals for the management of chronic disease: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(2). e40. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3703. [PubMed: 25707035]. [PubMed Central: PMC4376181].
  • 15. Pare G, Jaana M, Sicotte C. Systematic review of home telemonitoring for chronic diseases: the evidence base. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(3):269-77. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2270. [PubMed: 17329725]. [PubMed Central: PMC2244878].
  • 16. Chan CV, Kaufman DR. A framework for characterizing eHealth literacy demands and barriers. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4). e94. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1750. [PubMed: 22094891]. [PubMed Central: PMC3222196].
  • 17. Jin J, Yan X, Li Y, Li Y. How users adopt healthcare information: An empirical study of an online Q&A community. Int J Med Inform. 2016;86:91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.11.002. [PubMed: 26616406].
  • 18. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(2). e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9. [PubMed: 16867972]. [PubMed Central: PMC1550701].
  • 19. Or CK, Karsh BT, Severtson DJ, Burke LJ, Brown RL, Brennan PF. Factors affecting home care patients' acceptance of a web-based interactive self-management technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(1):51-9. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.007336. [PubMed: 21131605]. [PubMed Central: PMC3005875].
  • 20. Laugesen J, Hassanein K. Adoption of personal health records by chronic disease patients: A research model and an empirical study. Comput Human Behav. 2017;66:256-72.
  • 21. Or CK, Karsh BT. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(4):550-60. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2888. [PubMed: 19390112]. [PubMed Central: PMC2705259].
  • 22. Jha AK, Doolan D, Grandt D, Scott T, Bates DW. The use of health information technology in seven nations. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77(12):848-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.007. [PubMed: 18657471].
  • 23. Kurup R, Hu H, Kurup R, Thiagalingam A, Jin-Gun C, Lee V, et al. Utility and use of technology to access health information among patients with chronic diseases. Heart Lung Circ. 2015;24. S459. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.06.805.
  • 24. Turvey CL, Roberts LJ. Recent developments in the use of online resources and mobile technologies to support mental health care. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27(6):547-57. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2015.1087975. [PubMed: 26523397].
  • 25. van Deursen AJ, van Dijk JA. Internet skills performance tests: are people ready for eHealth? J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(2). e35. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1581. [PubMed: 21531690]. [PubMed Central: PMC3221376].
  • 26. Nahm ES, Blum K, Scharf B, Friedmann E, Thomas S, Jones D, et al. Exploration of patients' readiness for an eHealth management program for chronic heart failure: a preliminary study. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008;23(6):463-71. doi: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000338930.89210.79. [PubMed: 18953206].
  • 27. Asemi A. Information searching habits of Internet users: A case study on the Medical Sciences University of Isfahan, Iran. Webology. 2005;2(1):10.
  • 28. Ghassemzadeh L, Shahraray M, Moradi A. Prevalence of internet addiction and comparison of internet addicts and non-addicts in Iranian high schools. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11(6):731-3. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0243. [PubMed: 18954277].
  • 29. Haghayegh SA, Kajbaf MB, Shabani A, Nikbakht M, Farahani HA. Analysis of psychometrics properties of internet attitude scale (IAS_40). Health Inf Manag. 2008;5(1).
  • 30. Jennett PA, Gagnon MP, Brandstadt HK. Preparing for success: readiness models for rural telehealth. J Postgrad Med. 2005;51(4):279-85. [PubMed: 16388170].
  • 31. Jennett P, Jackson A, Healy T, Ho K, Kazanjian A, Woollard R, et al. A study of a rural community's readiness for telehealth. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9(5):259-63. doi: 10.1258/135763303769211265. [PubMed: 14599328].
  • 32. Seplovich G, Horvath KJ, Haughton LJ, Blackstock OJ. Get+connected: Development and pilot testing of an intervention to improve computer and internet attitudes and internet use among women living with hiv. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6(3). e50. doi: 10.2196/resprot.6391. [PubMed: 28363879]. [PubMed Central: PMC5392213].
  • 33. Duplaga M. A cross-sectional study assessing determinants of the attitude to the introduction of eHealth services among patients suffering from chronic conditions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015;15:33. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0157-3. [PubMed: 25927312]. [PubMed Central: PMC4409745].
  • 34. Perlemuter L, Yomtov B. Feasibility and usefulness of dedicated software and e-mail for self-monitoring blood glucose in treating diabetes. Diabet Med. 2002;19(8):701-2. [PubMed: 12147159].
  • 35. Samadbeik M, Saremian M, Garavand A, Hasanvandi N, Sanaeinasab S, et al. Assessing the online outpatient booking system. Shiraz E-Med J. 2018;19(4). e60249. doi: 10.5812/semj.60249.
  • 36. Katz SJ, Moyer CA, Cox DT, Stern DT. Effect of a triage-based E-mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(9):736-44. [PubMed: 12950483]. [PubMed Central: PMC1494914].
  • 37. Hanauer DA, Wentzell K, Laffel N, Laffel LM. Computerized Automated Reminder Diabetes System (CARDS): e-mail and SMS cell phone text messaging reminders to support diabetes management. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11(2):99-106. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0022. [PubMed: 19848576]. [PubMed Central: PMC4504120].
  • 38. Atherton H, Sawmynaden P, Sheikh A, Majeed A, Car J. Email for clinical communication between patients/caregivers and healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11. CD007978. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007978.pub2. [PubMed: 23152249].
  • 39. Makarem NN, Antoun J. Email communication in a developing country: different family physician and patient perspectives. Libyan J Med. 2016;11:32679. doi: 10.3402/ljm.v11.32679. [PubMed: 27855773]. [PubMed Central: PMC5114432].
  • 40. Peek ST, Wouters EJ, van Hoof J, Luijkx KG, Boeije HR, Vrijhoef HJ. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(4):235-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004. [PubMed: 24529817].
  • 41. Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manag. 2003;40(3):191-204. doi: 10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4.
  • 42. Rowley J, Johnson F, Sbaffi L. Gender as an influencer of online health information-seeking and evaluation behavior. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2017;68(1):36-47. doi: 10.1002/asi.23597.
  • 43. Ramanadhan S, Viswanath K. Health and the information nonseeker: a profile. Health Commun. 2006;20(2):131-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc2002_4. [PubMed: 16965250].
  • 44. Kontos EZ, Emmons KM, Puleo E, Viswanath K. Communication inequalities and public health implications of adult social networking site use in the United States. J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 3:216-35. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.522689. [PubMed: 21154095]. [PubMed Central: PMC3073379].
  • 45. Fox S, Purcell K. Chronic disease and the Internet: Pew Internet and American life project. Washington, DC: Pew research Center; 2010.
  • 46. Fox S, Jones S. The social life of health information. Pew Research Center; 2009.
  • 47. Fox S, Duggan M. Health online 2013. 1. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2013.
  • 48. Chou WY, Hunt YM, Beckjord EB, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(4). e48. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1249. [PubMed: 19945947]. [PubMed Central: PMC2802563].
  • 49. Beckjord EB, Finney Rutten LJ, Squiers L, Arora NK, Volckmann L, Moser RP, et al. Use of the internet to communicate with health care providers in the United States: estimates from the 2003 and 2005 Health Information National Trends Surveys (HINTS). J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(3). e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.3.e20. [PubMed: 17627929]. [PubMed Central: PMC2047283].
  • 50. Baumann E, Czerwinski F, Reifegerste D. Gender-specific determinants and patterns of online health information seeking: Results from a representative german health survey. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(4). e92. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6668. [PubMed: 28377367]. [PubMed Central: PMC5395693].
  • 51. Antoun J. Electronic mail communication between physicians and patients: a review of challenges and opportunities. Fam Pract. 2016;33(2):121-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv101. [PubMed: 26711957].
  • 52. Lennon MR, Bouamrane MM, Devlin AM, O'Connor S, O'Donnell C, Chetty U, et al. Readiness for delivering digital health at scale: Lessons from a longitudinal qualitative evaluation of a national digital health innovation program in the United Kingdom. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(2). e42. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6900. [PubMed: 28209558]. [PubMed Central: PMC5334516].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments