Sexual Self-Efficacy and Associated Factors: A Review

AUTHORS

Rafat Assarzadeh 1 , Zahra Bostani Khalesi 1 , * , Fatemeh Jafarzadeh-Kenarsari 1

1 Social Determinants of Health Research Center (SDHRC), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

How to Cite: Assarzadeh R , Bostani Khalesi Z, Jafarzadeh-Kenarsari F . Sexual Self-Efficacy and Associated Factors: A Review, Shiraz E-Med J. Online ahead of Print ; 20(11):e87537. doi: 10.5812/semj.87537.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Shiraz E-Medical Journal: 20 (11); e87537
Published Online: July 1, 2019
Article Type: Review Article
Received: December 14, 2018
Revised: April 12, 2019
Accepted: April 14, 2019
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Context: Sexual self-efficacy (SSE) is a key concept in sexual behavior and sexual health. The overall purpose of this research was to review of the factors related to the sexual self-efficacy.

Evidence Acquisition: An extensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, Social Science Research Network, CINAHL, Psych INFO, Magiran, Iran Medex, Iran Doc, SID and Google Scholar. This review study was conducted according to the PRISMA checklist. Eligible studies were identified from English and Persian databases, published between 1990 and 2018. Studies were screened independently by two researchers who performed the data extraction.

Results: Of 128 studies identified, 25 studies met our inclusion criteria. Factors related to SSE were summarized into 4 groups: socio-demographic factors (e.g. age, race, socioeconomic status, parental support, social support, religious obligations, negotiation skills, addicts, working hours, history of delivery, physical problem), marital status factors (e.g., failure in marriage, marital satisfaction, marital quality, marriage duration, intimacy), sexual history factors (e.g. sexual self-concept, sexual experience, confidence in sexual relationships, sexual activity, sexual self-schema, sexual adjustment, childhood sexual abuse, sexual disorders, sexual risk cognition, experiences of abuse or violence, partner’s belief, experiences of sex-therapy training), psychological factors (e.g. obsession, psychosis, anxiety, depression, paranoia, phobia, individual sensitivity, aggression).

Conclusions: With regards to the important role of SSE in sexual health, deeper perception factors related to SSE are needed. More comprehension of these agents can acquaint targeted approaches in order to improve SSE and reduce the sexual problems.

Keywords

Self-Efficacy Sexual Behavior Sexual Health Sexual Self-Efficacy

Copyright © 2019, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Context

The concept of self-efficacy is the belief in one’s capabilities in the aptitude to overcome challenges, adversities, and obstacles in one’s life (1). It is a predictor of health behavior and as the most important part of individual behavioral change (2). Also, it is effective as a protective factor against risky sexual behaviors such as inconsistent condom use (3).

Psychologist Albert Bandura has indicated self-efficacy can boost confidence in people’s ability to achieve positive behaviors, as well as the opinion that they have control of sure situations in their surroundings (4). Self-efficacy is the most important part of Bandura’s social cognitive theory (SCT) to be used in health promotion (5).

The most key concepts of sexual health related to Bandura’s SCT that should be understood is sexual self-efficacy (SSE) (6). SSE is one’s belief to be able as someone who can make decisions about their sexuality and avoid high-risk sexual behavior (7).

SSE focuses’ on a person’s control over sexual life, competence and ability of the person as a sexual agent, ability to involve in safe sexual action, suitability as a sexual partner and ability to obtain sexual satisfaction (8).

SSE plays a fundamental role in sexual decision-making, a result being the prevention of risky sexual behavior sexually transmitted infections (9). SSE has the highest communication with sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) prevention. It is also known as perceived control and is a commonly used predictor of sexual behavior because young people who have higher perceived SSE reveal less risky sexual activity (10). The high perceived SSE of the persons can increase pleasurable and enjoyable sex, healthy sexual activities, followed by sexual health and health promotion (6). Enhancement of SSE is an important component for effective behavioral change, aimed at reducing unsafe sex (5).

There has been a developing comprehension that SSE is affected by macro factors that are substantial for realization of decision-making about sexual issues and behavior (11). SSE (i.e. being sensibly confident and having a feeling of mastery about how to manage oneself sexually) directing girls to make better decision- making about sexual behavior and to more positively explicate their experiences (9).

Although evidence suggests that SSE is necessary for the sexual function and safe sexual behavior (11), the factors related to the SSE remain marginalized and neglected in sexual health education programs. While understanding these factors may improve people’s knowledge, attitudes, beliefs or behavioral practices and could lead to a reduction in risky sexual behavior (12).

Therefore, it seems that a review of the literature that is not restricted to youth or to peer-reviewed publications, or to specific types of outcomes or study designs, that examines the literature regarding the only sexual self-efficacy is necessary. The objective of this scoping review is to describe the scientific literature on the related factors. The results of this study can be used to plan educational and promotional interventions for promoting sexual health.

2. Evidence Acquisition

2.1. Data Sources and Search Strategy

We conducted a comprehensive review of literature published between 1990 and 2018 focusing on the factors related to the SSE. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews (PRISMA) principles were used to extend the process explained in this review (13). A search of the literature was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, Social Science Research Network (SSRN), CINAHL, Psych INFO as databases for English documents and Iran Medex, SID, Magiran, Google Scholar and Iran Doc as databases for Persian documents. ProQuest Dissertations, gray literature publications of the New York Academy of Medicine, WHO Global Health Library, Scopus, Popline and PAIS were searched for gray literature. Articles were identified using the search terms “self-efficacy”, “sexual”, “sexual self-efficacy”, “sexual health”, “health” “psychology” and “public health” according to the medical subject headings (MeSH).

Manual reference checks of publications were performed to supplement the electronic search.

The finds of peer-reviewed search were entered into EndNote by SSE subject. In return, because of restrictions on the investigative capacity of the databases for gray literature, results of the gray search were entered into EndNote in relation to SSE more widely.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

Two authors autonomously assessed every record caption for inclusion in this review, and a third author adjudicated when disagreement occurred. Detailed records were made about the purpose of each document, participants, data collection, methods of research, validity and reliability of the questionnaire, and the results of the study. We included studies meeting the following criteria: studies that explored factors related to SSE, published in English and Persian language. Published between 1990 to 2018. Published qualitative, mixed methods, or quantitative studies. Studies were excluded when the study topic was irrelevant to the SSE.

2.3. Quality Assessment and Data Extraction

The checklist of critical appraisal skills program (CASP) was used for evaluating methodologies, ensuring reliability, and for drawing the right conclusions on qualitative and quantitative studies. Principles of appropriate research method, collection of data, data analysis, the validity and clarity of results which used to evaluate the weaknesses and strengths of each document as inclusion or exclusion criteria in this review (14). By determining the record, according to these factors, we were able to recognize strengths and weaknesses of studies. Whole duplicate documents were recognized and deleted. Two reviewers autonomously screened the title and abstracts of the article for eligibility. Then, the reason for removing studies was recorded. According to the inclusion criteria, 25 relevant articles were retrieved.

3. Results

A total of 128 records were excluded from screening the title and abstract. Of the remaining 66 records, full texts were sought and 25 were retained. Reasons for record excluded, No full text available (n = 10), were no SSE measure (n = 12), dissertation (n = 2), conference abstract or letter (n = 7), and unable to obtain full text (n = 1) (Figure 1).

We’ve found some of main factors related to SSE. These factors can be divided into 4 broad groups that include:

• Socio-demographic factors: age, race, socioeconomic status, parental support, social support, religious obligations, negotiation skills, addicts, working hours, history of delivery, physical problem.

• Marital status factors: failure in marital, marital satisfaction, marital quality, marriage duration, intimacy.

• Sexual history factors: sexual self-concept, sexual experience, confidence in sexual relationships, sexual activity, sexual self-schema, sexual adjustment, childhood sexual abuse, sexual disorders, sexual risk cognition, experiences of abuse or violence, partner’s belief, experiences of sex-therapy training.

• Psychological factors: obsession, psychosis, anxiety, depression, paranoia, phobia, individual sensitivity, aggression.

Full details of the 25 included records are exposed in Table 1.

Table 1. Characteristics and Main Result of Studies Included in the Systematic Review
Authors, YearDesignSample SizeData Collection TechniqueMain Outcomes
Oluwole (1990) (15)Descriptive 2000 womenQuestionnaireThe findings showed a significant relationship between SSE and marital satisfaction.
Seal et al. (1997) (16)Correlative 121 womenQuestionnaireFindings explore the connection between SSE on the amount of sexual activity, which in turn, is positively related to risk taking.
Reissing et al. (2005) (17)Cross-sectional 84 womenQuestionnaireThe findings suggest that SSE mediated the association between sexual adjustment and sexual self-schema.
Steinke et al. (2008) (18)Correlative 59 healthy elders and 85 patients with HFQuestionnaireResearch findings suggest there is a relationship between SSE and sexual activity. A higher sexual self-concept of greater SSE were predictors of sexual activity.
Rostosky et al. (2008) (19)Cross-sectional 388 studentsQuestionnaireMales reported lower sexual esteem and lower SSE than females. Sexual self-esteem uniquely predicted higher SSE scores.
Vaziri et al. (2010) (20)Correlative 194 womenQuestionnaireResearch results suggest a relationship between SSE and marital satisfaction and SSE scores is predicted of marital satisfaction.
Sarikhani et al. (2011) (21)Quasi-experimental200 womenPre and post-test in experimental and control groupThe findings showed that women’s SSE reduces after delivery.
Viseskul et al. (2013) (22)Cross-sectional 92 HIV-positiveQuestionnaireThe scores of the SSE were significantly lower in those aged 17 to 21 than in 14 to 16.
Zimmer-Gembeck (2013) (23)Correlative 199 womenQuestionnaireResearch findings explore the indirect association of women’s autonomy with SSE.
Nooripour et al. (2013) (24)Quasi-experimental40 couplesPre and post-test in experimental and control groupFindings indicate that training significantly improved marital satisfaction and SSE.
Redmond and Lewis (2014) (25)Cross-sectional 214 women QuestionnaireThe results indicated significant differences exist between genders in perception of SSE. Having high negotiation skills were significant predictors for highly perceived SSE.
Nooripour et al. (2014) (26)Case – Control 40 couplesPre and post-test in experimental and control groupFindings indicate that training significantly improved SSE of participants.
Widman et al. (2013) (27)Cross-sectional476 people living with HIVQuestionnaireThe results indicated that greater SSE predicted unsafe intercourse.
Alirezaee et al. (2014) (28)Historical cohort 170 fertile and 85 infertile womenQuestionnaireThe results indicated that infertility is associated with poor SSE.
Salehi et al. (2015) (29)Cross-sectional200 participants with physical-motor disabilitiesQuestionnaireResearch findings indicated that sexual self-efficacy score in women with physical-motor disabilities were higher than men in all domains and there was a relationship between men’s sexual self-efficacy with their self-esteem.
Hsu et al. (2015) (30)Cross-sectional 713 Nursing studentsAnonymous mailed questionnaireFindings suggest that sexual self-concept significantly predicted SSE. SSE predicted by sexual risk cognition.
Norton et al. (2016) (31)Longitudinal296 couplesComputer-assisted self interviewsThe results showed higher artist status principals were considerably related to more SSE, higher artist toughness principals were related to less SSE, and higher artist anti-femininity principals were considerably related to less SSE.
Rosenthal et al. (1991) (10)Cross-sectional1788 QuestionnaireThe finding indicated that Females were significantly more SSE than males
Zare et al. (2016) (7)Correlative 79 womenQuestionnaireThe result shows that SSE in women has a positive effect on marital satisfaction.
Tung et al. (2011) (32)Cross-sectional996 college studentsQuestionnaireThe findings showed that SSE prevents of female students to practice unsafe sex.
Hajinia and Khalatbari (2017) (9)Quasi-experimental30 womenPre-test and post-test in experimental and control groupThe results from this study revealed that sex therapy improves SSE.
Addoh et al. (2017) (33)Multivariable logistic regression models157 female college studentsQuestionnaireResults showed that a greater degree of SSE is associated with increased of safe-sex practice.
Malonzo and Chavez (2012) (34)Descriptive study80 womenQuestionnaireThere was a significant relationship between SSE and sexual risk cognitions.
Golmakani et al. (2018) (35)Experimental79 womenPre and post-test in experimental and control groupThe results revealed that the pelvic muscles exercise in women after delivery improve the SSE.
Fedding and Rossi (1999) (36)Cross-sectional305 male and female college studentsQuestionnaireThe results suggest that SSE can help in enhancing safer sex adoption and adherence at both public and individual sexual health levels.

4. Discussion

SSE has become an important structure in sexual health in recent years. From the early 20th century, researchers in the sexual health sector have tried to identify the positioning and factors that affect SSE (37). At least two thirds of the studies reported SSE as a key protective factor (38). The results presented here provide related factors to SSE. Socio-demographic, marital status, sexual history, psychological disorders appeared to be related to SSE.

Twenty-five studies were used to identify the factors.

A biological factor affecting SSE is age. The result is that with increasing age, SSE is promoted. During in the early adolescent level SSE is lower than young people (22). Before school age, sexual knowledge grows as the gender identity is shaped. SSE slowly grows over time. Over time also, sexual anxiety is reduced and SSE is evolving, which affects the individual’s future behavior (39).

It has been shown that gender is significantly associated with SSE. Gender differences in SSE, such that the female has stronger SSE than male, may be influenced by societal engrained sexual scripts that depict the sexual desires of young men as something that should not or possibly cannot be suppressed (25).

The findings showed a significant relationship between SSE and the marital status (40). Higher SSE is accompanied by marital satisfaction and experiences and more sexual activities in one’s lifetime (7). Also, divorced individuals have more SSE, greater incentive to avoid high-risk sexual behaviors and report more fear (40).

SSE is higher in non-Africans than other ethnic groups (8). African and African - American women have a unique history of slavery, exploitation and victimization in their own countries and their sexuality is debated. In addition, contradictory and negative implications such as hypersexual and asexual “Mammy type” can be dangerous. When sexual stereotypes are associated with the image of vixen, bad girl, anxiety, incompetence and sexual dysfunction appear (36).

A number of studies have shown that people with higher levels of education have higher SSE (22). Also, the literature review shows that increased social support or family communication predicted improved SSE, especially for young women (4). High negotiation skills and a sexual partner’s belief were predictors of high perceived SSE (25).

SSE has a relationship with marriage duration (41), sexual disorders (42), marital quality (26), sexual activity (43), failure in marital, intimacy (36). Seutlwadi’s investigation in 2015, showed that women who ever experienced forced sex had lower SSE (37). Slonim-Nevo and Mukuka’s study indicates that the sexual abuse in adolescence was related to low SSE (38).

Also, confidence in sexual relationships anticipates higher levels of SSE (39). Hsu et al. (30) revealed the effect of sexual self concept on SSE. The results from their study supported that sexual self concept has a positive and direct effect on SSE and participants with higher sexual self concept and higher sexual risk cognition have higher SSE. Their sexual risk cognition showed to have a positive influence on SSE. Adolescents had higher sexual self-esteem uniquely predicted higher SSE scores (19, 41).

Many studies suggest that SSE increases through participation in educational programs (26, 44, 45). For example, Nooripour et al., in their study showed that sex-therapy training positively affects SSE (26).

The majority of research examining the link between mindfulness training on increasing the SSE confirm this link. Also, women who reported a high level of violence were more probable to have low SSE (45).

There was a significant and negative relationship between the depression, obsession, anxiety, individual sensitivity, phobia, aggression, psychosis and paranoia with SSE. In total, Vaziri et al. showed that physical complaints, depression, and psychosis were able to predict SSE (20).

4.1. Conclusions

This review presents facts in the field of factors related to SSE. The results of this review indicate that factors related to SSE included: socio-demographic, marital status, sexual history and psychological factors. With regards to the important role of SSE in sexual health, deeper perceptive factors related to SSE are needed. More comprehension of these agents can acquaint targeted approaches in order to improve SSE and reduce the sexual problems.

On the other hand, health providers and sex therapists can benefit from the results of this study to obtain a further understanding of the foundations of sex and, eventually, to help increase SSE because some of the sexual problems could be obviated by increasing SSE.

Since the findings of this review have been based on longitudinal and cross-sectional studies with various designs and sample size, for a better recognition of the factors related to the SSE, A prospective cohort study is suggested.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Bandura A, Adams NE, Beyer J. Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1977;35(3):125-39. [PubMed: 15093].

  • 2.

    Gerke D, Budd EL, Plax K. Measurement noninvariance of safer sex self-efficacy between heterosexual and sexual minority black youth. J Soc Social Work Res. 2016;7(3):569-84. doi: 10.1086/688047. [PubMed: 27617061]. [PubMed Central: PMC5014365].

  • 3.

    Fichten C, Spector I, Amsel R, Creti L, Brender W, Libman E. Handbook of sexuality related measures. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.

  • 4.

    Khalesi ZB, Simbar M, Azin SA. A qualitative study of sexual health education among Iranian engaged couples. Afr Health Sci. 2017;17(2):382-90. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v17i2.12. [PubMed: 29062333]. [PubMed Central: PMC5637023].

  • 5.

    Lou JH, Chen SH, Li RH, Yu HY. Relationships among sexual self-concept, sexual risk cognition and sexual communication in adolescents: A structural equation model. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(11-12):1696-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03358.x. [PubMed: 21040039].

  • 6.

    Khalesi ZB, Bokaie M. The association between pregnancy-specific anxiety and preterm birth: A cohort study. Afr Health Sci. 2018;18(3):569-75. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v18i3.14. [PubMed: 30602989]. [PubMed Central: PMC6306999].

  • 7.

    Zare Z, Golmakani N, Shareh H, Shakeri MT. [Survey of relationship between sexual self-efficacy and sexual life quality with marital satisfaction in primiparous women after childbirth]. J Student Res Committee Sabzevar Univ Med Sci (Beyhagh). 2016;21(36):1-10. Persian.

  • 8.

    Closson K, Dietrich JJ, Lachowsky NJ, Nkala B, Palmer A, Cui Z, et al. Sexual self-efficacy and gender: A review of condom use and sexual negotiation among young men and women in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Sex Res. 2018;55(4-5):522-39. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2017.1421607. [PubMed: 29466024].

  • 9.

    Hajinia A, Khalatbari J. The effectiveness of sex therapy on sexual self-efficacy and marital satisfaction of diabetic women. Int Acad J Psychol Educ Stud. 2017;2(1):33-42.

  • 10.

    Rosenthal D, Moore S, Flynn I. Adolescent self-efficacy, self-esteem and sexual risk-taking. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 1991;1(2):77-88. doi: 10.1002/casp.2450010203.

  • 11.

    Panjalipour S, Bostani Khalesi Z, Mirhaghjoo SN. Iranian female adolescents’ reproductive health needs: A systematic review. Int J Women Health Reprod Sci. 2017;6(3):226-32. doi: 10.15296/ijwhr.2018.39.

  • 12.

    Bokaie M, Khalesi ZB, Yasini-Ardekani SM. Diagnosis and treatment of unconsummated marriage in an Iranian couple. Afr Health Sci. 2017;17(3):632-6. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v17i3.5. [PubMed: 29085390]. [PubMed Central: PMC5656205].

  • 13.

    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Prisma Group . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535. [PubMed: 19622551]. [PubMed Central: PMC2714657].

  • 14.

    Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-based medicine working group. JAMA. 1993;270(21):2598-601. [PubMed: 8230645].

  • 15.

    Oluwole DA. Marital satisfaction: Connections of self disclosure, sexual self efficacy and spirituality among Nigeria women. Pakistan J Soc Sci. 2008;5(5):464-9.

  • 16.

    Seal A, Minichiello V, Omodei M. Young women's sexual risk taking behaviour: Re-visiting the influences of sexual self-efficacy and sexual self-esteem. Int J STD AIDS. 1997;8(3):159-65. doi: 10.1258/0956462971919822. [PubMed: 9089026].

  • 17.

    Reissing ED, Laliberte GM, Davis HJ. Young women's sexual adjustment: The role of sexual self-schema, sexual self-efficacy, sexual aversion and body attitudes. Can J Hum Sex. 2005;14(3/4):77.

  • 18.

    Steinke EE, Wright DW, Chung ML, Moser DK. Sexual self-concept, anxiety, and self-efficacy predict sexual activity in heart failure and healthy elders. Heart Lung. 2008;37(5):323-33. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2007.09.004. [PubMed: 18790333].

  • 19.

    Rostosky SS, Dekhtyar O, Cupp PK, Anderman EM. Sexual self-concept and sexual self-efficacy in adolescents: A possible clue to promoting sexual health? J Sex Res. 2008;45(3):277-86. doi: 10.1080/00224490802204480. [PubMed: 18686156].

  • 20.

    Vaziri S, Lotfi Kashani F, Hosseinian S, Ghafari Bahram S. [Sexual efficacy and marital satisfaction]. Thought Behav Clin Psychol. 2010;4(16):75-81. Persian.

  • 21.

    Sarikhani R, Merghati Khoii E, Jahdi F. [Comparing the effectiveness of TTM based sex education with the traditional approach in sexual self‑efficacy of Primiparous women in the postpartum] [dissertation]. Tehran, Iran: Tehran University of Medical Sciences; 2011. Persian.

  • 22.

    Viseskul N, Fongkaew W, Settheekul S, Grimes RM. Factors related to sexual self-efficacy among Thai youth living with HIV/AIDS. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2015;14(5):423-7. doi: 10.1177/2325957413488188. [PubMed: 23708679].

  • 23.

    Zimmer-Gembeck MJ. Young females' sexual self-efficacy: Associations with personal autonomy and the couple relationship. Sex Health. 2013;10(3):204-10. doi: 10.1071/SH12139. [PubMed: 23591062].

  • 24.

    Nooripour R, Bass CK, Apsche J. Effectiveness of quality of life therapy aimed at improving sexual self-efficacy and marital satisfaction in addict couples of treatment period. Int J Behav Consult Ther. 2013;8(2):26-9. doi: 10.1037/h0100973.

  • 25.

    Redmond ML, Lewis RK. Are there gender differences in perceived sexual self-efficacy among African-American adolescents? J Health Disparities Res Pract. 2014;7(5):1.

  • 26.

    Nooripour R, de Velasco BP, ZadeMohammadi A, Ventegod S, Bayles C, Blossom P, et al. Effectiveness of quality of life therapy on sexual self-efficacy and quality of life in addicted couples. Int J Behav Consult Ther. 2014;9(1):43-5. doi: 10.1037/h0101015.

  • 27.

    Widman L, Golin CE, Grodensky CA, Suchindran C. Do safer sex self-efficacy, attitudes toward condoms, and HIV transmission risk beliefs differ among men who have sex with men, heterosexual men, and women living with HIV? AIDS Behav. 2013;17(5):1873-82. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-0108-7. [PubMed: 22252475]. [PubMed Central: PMC3657340].

  • 28.

    Alirezaee S, Ozgoli G, Alavi Majd H. [Comparison of sexual self-efficacy and sexual function in fertile and infertile women referred to health centers in Mashhad in 1392]. Pajoohande. 2014;19(3):131-6. Persian.

  • 29.

    Salehi M, Kharaz Tavakol H, Shabani M, Ziaei T. The relationship between self-esteem and sexual self-concept in people with physical-motor disabilities. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17(1). e25359. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.25359. [PubMed: 25763279]. [PubMed Central: PMC4341498].

  • 30.

    Hsu HY, Yu HY, Lou JH, Eng CJ. Relationships among sexual self-concept and sexual risk cognition toward sexual self-efficacy in adolescents: Cause-and-effect model testing. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2015;12(2):124-34. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12056. [PubMed: 25346398].

  • 31.

    Norton MK, Smith MV, Magriples U, Kershaw TS. Masculine ideology, sexual communication, and sexual self-efficacy among parenting adolescent couples. Am J Community Psychol. 2016;58(1-2):27-35. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12078. [PubMed: 27539234].

  • 32.

    Tung WC, Cook DM, Lu M. Sexual behavior, stages of condom use, and self-efficacy among college students in Taiwan. AIDS Care. 2011;23(1):113-20. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2010.498863. [PubMed: 21218284].

  • 33.

    Addoh O, Sng E, Loprinzi PD. Safe sex self-efficacy and safe sex practice in a Southern United States College. Health Promot Perspect. 2017;7(2):74-9. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2017.14. [PubMed: 28326287]. [PubMed Central: PMC5350553].

  • 34.

    Malonzo EM, Chavez F Jr. Sexual-esteem, sexual self efficacy and sexual risk cognitions of men who have sex with men (MSM) in Davao city. S East Asia Interdiscipl Res J. 2013;1(1):59-76.

  • 35.

    Golmakani N, Zare Z, Khadem N, Shareh H, Shakeri MT. The effect of pelvic floor muscle exercises program on sexual self-efficacy in primiparous women after delivery. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018;20(3):347-53. [PubMed: 26120335]. [PubMed Central: PMC4462060].

  • 36.

    Fedding CA, Rossi JS. Testing a model of situational self-efficacy for safer sex among college students: Stage of change and gender-based diffewnces. Psychol Health. 1999;14(3):467-86. doi: 10.1080/08870449908407341.

  • 37.

    Krahe B, Berger A. Longitudinal pathways of sexual victimization, sexual self-esteem, and depression in women and men. Psychol Trauma. 2017;9(2):147-55. doi: 10.1037/tra0000198. [PubMed: 27669161].

  • 38.

    Slonim-Nevo V, Mukuka L. Child abuse and AIDS-related knowledge, attitudes and behavior among adolescents in Zambia. Child Abuse Negl. 2007;31(2):143-59. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.08.006. [PubMed: 17303239].

  • 39.

    Jenkins M. A concept analysis of self-efficacy and adolescent sexual risk-taking behavior. Nurs Forum. 2015;50(1):31-6. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12070. [PubMed: 24397774].

  • 40.

    Hinchliff S, Gott M. Intimacy, commitment, and adaptation: Sexual relationships within long-term marriages. J Soc Pers Relat. 2016;21(5):595-609. doi: 10.1177/0265407504045889.

  • 41.

    Rowland DL, Adamski BA, Neal CJ, Myers AL, Burnett AL. Self-efficacy as a relevant construct in understanding sexual response and dysfunction. J Sex Marital Ther. 2015;41(1):60-71. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2013.811453. [PubMed: 24328698].

  • 42.

    Miller SA, Byers ES. Practicing psychologists' sexual intervention self-efficacy and willingness to treat sexual issues. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(4):1041-50. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9877-3. [PubMed: 22187026].

  • 43.

    Kamen C, Flores S, Etter D, Lazar R, Patrick R, Lee S, et al. General self-efficacy in relation to unprotected sexual encounters among persons living with HIV. J Health Psychol. 2013;18(5):658-66. doi: 10.1177/1359105312454039. [PubMed: 22933575].

  • 44.

    Boone MR, Cherenack EM, Wilson PA; ATN Protocol Team. Self-efficacy for sexual risk reduction and partner HIV status as correlates of sexual risk behavior among HIV-positive adolescent girls and women. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015;29(6):346-53. doi: 10.1089/apc.2014.0175. [PubMed: 25856632]. [PubMed Central: PMC4516953].

  • 45.

    Klein H. Condom use self-efficacy and HIV risk practices among men who use the internet to find male partners for unprotected sex. Am J Mens Health. 2014;8(3):190-204. doi: 10.1177/1557988313492172. [PubMed: 23832954]. [PubMed Central: PMC6124669].

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: